Freedom of expression. Criminologist, a columnist for "Current", testified in favor of Eric Zemmour.
What I told the judge
Xavier Raufer
Thursday, January 13, I testified in favor of Eric Zemmour before the 17th chamber of the Paris Criminal Court. What have I said to the judges? First, a small pack persecuting monopolized the right to hunt, in his detestation, who deviated from his leftist doctrine.
The proof shortly after Zemmour small Torquemada was outraged propriety, the socialist Malek Boutih said in public (We're not lying, November 10, 2010): "When I look at the youth center inmates Fleury -Merogis [...] I found that the proportion of visible minority youth, Africans, North Africans, is exceptional compared to what they represent in French society. "But these remarks were buried and Mr. Boutih - who said the same, if not worse than Zemmour - has been sued by anyone, nor by any league that under the initiative of justice.
Symbolized by a balance, a sign of balance and fairness, the same court may still claim to embody these concepts when, by unilateral action, it reduces one to silence regularly by not worry others?
On the merits, I loved that about Zemmour will prove difficult in France because of ethnic statistics, but checked in neighboring countries, where such data exist. In the Netherlands for example - that are not exactly a fascist dictatorship - there is five times more juvenile delinquents or criminals of Moroccan origin as native Dutch of the same ages.
There are probably reasons for such disparities - but under further study. At the outset, and at first glance, there is disparity indeed: this is nothing more has probably wanted to expose Eric Zemmour. But beyond this particular case, I should like to draw, and with gravity, the attention of judges on the serious risks they are collectively run the judiciary by promoting an imbalance ever more shocking.
The moment was continued Zemmour, thugs claiming to be "artists" published this cry of hate, "I shouted aloud j'baise your nation / We packed up and fart on their ass / [...] In every opportunity, from qu'tu can kiss / fuck pigs which represent the order in France. Now, twenty times recently, such vomit and worse, were acquitted by the courts under the artistic creation, and scoundrels who colt, presented as many new Rimbaud and Apollinaire's "9-3".
So some are free to insult, to incite to murder and racial hatred, while others suffocated in the slightest mention of a fact ascertainable by anyone with eyes to see.
Before that, why even talk about "free speech"? It is not reasonable. This is not fair. And even this ad - this is serious under the rule of law - a growing distrust of the judiciary to so hemiplegic. Xavier Raufer
0 comments:
Post a Comment