(...) The overrepresentation of blacks and Arabs in Crime is a fact, he only discovered it. He answered that ethnic statistics are illegal in France. Yes, but studies on populations of foreign origin or non-Catholics are legion. INSEE, for example, is based on the nationality of the parents to consider the weight of discrimination in employment. Besides journalists reminiscent of the nationality or origins of any particular suspects in felony or misdemeanor, even when it has nothing to do with the alleged crime .(...)
Meanwhile, as revealed by Rue89, the Eric Zemmour defense produced a letter of support from Jean-Pierre Chevenement in which he confirms the reality of reality that is the assignment of the accused: "Just as I had the opportunity to consult listings of the Central Public Security Ministry of the Interior, to find that over 50% of violations reported were due to young people whose surname is African or North African-sounding. "
But the rest of the argument Zemmour reveals a flaw in the anti-racist discourse. Citing including glorisation Team France 1998 "Black, Blanc, Beur," he said "for 30 years, was sacred difference and now it appears the Republican universalism." The defendant then put the anti-racists face their dilemma: "Either we take the American model with communalism and ethnic statistics, it is no longer say that Zidane and Thuram is Kabyle Guadeloupe" . And he hit hard, "Ideologically, these people are dishonest. " The opposing camp had to appreciate.
Continuing his attack against Eric Zemmour said that "anti-racism is the loincloth of the bid from the left to the market, neoliberal globalization." "I broke with the Left because of SOS Racisme (...) republican universalism, they trampled the right to difference". Columnist for Le Figaro magazine said it "come from a Republican who left laïcarde and refuses differentialism ».(...)
http://www.marianne2.fr/Proces-Zemmour-plus-pertinent-a -the-bar-that-a-la-tele-_a201594.html
Lucienne Bui-Trong, former head of the City and Suburbs section to GR was more accurate and was based on studies showing that in the 1990s, "85%" of the "leaders of urban violence "had a North African-sounding name .(...)
Another study was cited by several witnesses. A 2002 report by a commission of inquiry of the Senate on juvenile delinquency pointing a "surdélinquance youth from immigrant families" based on the work of sociologist Sebastian Roche. These figures show that 22.3% of such youth with both parents nationality a North African countries have already committed more than ten less serious acts of delinquency against 13.1% of French children.
Malek Boutih, then president of ... SOS Racisme, testified before the Committee noting that "there are more" tan "than white in the centers of young detainees." He added: "Furthermore, in immigrant families, children are quickly over. Already, a general in France, the relationship to knowledge tends to be reversed due to technological changes, new reports urban, and younger generations may have a better knowledge than their parents in society. So, among immigrants, imagine! ... "
With such discussions semantic-genetic, we forget the substantive debate. Whether you agree or disagree with Eric Zemmour, it should be allowed to consider non-economic causes of crime. We can challenge the details of measuring instruments, but simply say that poverty is the only mechanical cause of delinquency does not lead very far. But the plaintiffs never addressed this point, and witnesses Zemmour, as Xavier Raufer, never really stressed either, just a few statistics relating to more or less brilliantly.
Here is precisely the problem. The taboo of the discussion on non-economic causes of crime because it is mentioned in Ardisson at best, at worst the court. "Nobody has difficulty talking about immigration statistics or blacks and Arabs", has however said the lawyer for the MRAP. To prove it, he would have had to deal with Eric Zemmour as a political opponent and not as an offender.
http://www.marianne2.fr/Proces-Zemmour-doit-on-aller-au-tribunal-pour-debattre-d-immigration_a201627.html?com
0 comments:
Post a Comment